What New Military Strategy And Technology Was Used In Ww1 – As part of ongoing efforts to modernize the battlefield, the US military is working with Kord Technologies to deploy laser weapons on the ground. The newly created Short-Range Directed Energy Maneuver Air Defense System (or DE M-SHORAD for short), a 50-kilowatt-class laser integrated into the Stryker vehicle, is designed to shoot down threats like drones and mortars without the use of weapons and heavy artillery. Following a successful combat firing earlier this year, Kord Technologies is preparing four prototype laser weapon systems mounted on Stryker armored vehicles to be fielded in September 2022.
Here, Wesley Freiwald, vice president of space superiority and missile defense at KBR, the parent company of Kord Technologies, explains how this revolutionary system works and why it’s a valuable asset to the military.
- What New Military Strategy And Technology Was Used In Ww1
- Raytheon Rethinks Strategy To Compete In Military Satellite Market
- Russia’s New Military Strategy Is Less Numbers, More Technology
- What China’s New Central Military Commission Tells Us About Xi’s Military Strategy
- Japan Approves Major Defense Overhaul In Dramatic Policy Shift
- Ukraine Updates: Russia ‘using Scorched Earth Tactics’
- Book Reviews: Weapons Don’t Make War: Policy, Strategy & Military Technology. By Colin S. Gray. Kansas: University Press Of Kansas. 1993. Xi + 236 Pp. Us$29.95. Isbn 0 7006 0559 2. The
- Armistice Day: How The British Used World War I Technology In The Middle East
What New Military Strategy And Technology Was Used In Ww1
The lasers being created for the military are nothing like the lasers you know. Compared to the average laser pointer, which is around 0.005 watts and effectively harmless, DE M-SHORAD weapon systems have significantly more power. Even 50 kilowatts of power, to be exact. They can destroy drones and mortars, providing assistance to troops and protection on the ground.
Raytheon Rethinks Strategy To Compete In Military Satellite Market
For those who want to get technical, the DE M-SHORAD weapon system uses solid-state lasers that use the lanthanide elements on the periodic table – lanthanum (57) through lutetium (71) – otherwise known as the rare earth metals. These elements have high excitation levels, which means you can get a lot of power or energy out of them without chemicals or gas. And that’s helpful to the military for a number of reasons.
According to Freiwald, solid-state lasers can help reduce cost per kill, a metric often used to measure the value of a defense system. “Having heavy lead and explosives around requires a lot of logistics and is very expensive,” he says. “With solid-state lasers, all you really need is a large supply of batteries, which, in the case of the DE M-SHORAD weapon system, are already integrated into the Stryker vehicle.
“Because you don’t carry the commercial regulations, taking into account the people it takes to restock those things, solid-state lasers are, logistically, a little kinder.”
Lagging, or lack thereof, is another significant advantage of the DE M-SHORAD system. You don’t leave unexploded ordnance on the battlefield, which is a big problem. What remains to use this type of laser technology for targeted defense is a burned drone or mortar, which can no longer pose a threat.
Russia’s New Military Strategy Is Less Numbers, More Technology
Although the risk is never zero, the DE M-SHORAD system is generally easier, more cost-effective and safer to use than traditional kinetic ballistic weapons. “You turn it on and off,” says Freiwald. “With a rocket, you have to load it, launch it and keep your fingers crossed as it goes towards the target. If it hits him, great; if not, then you have to load another rocket and start the process all over again.”
Several companies are collaborating to build every component of the DE M-SHORAD system, from Stryker vehicles and lasers to laser banks, but Kord and KBR are the glue that holds the project together. “You have to integrate all these pieces, and KBR is an expert integration company with a long history in the directed energy business,” says Freiwald. The company is currently finalizing four prototypes that will hit the ground running next September.
“If these are successful, the army plans to acquire more of them to work with kinetic programs,” he adds.
Once Soldiers begin using this system in tactical environments, KBR will take all the lessons learned from the first four prototypes and begin to optimize and adapt them for future use.
What China’s New Central Military Commission Tells Us About Xi’s Military Strategy
Why the Centurion is such a dangerous tank This was the only tank in the Russian military parade why South Korea will not build any nuclear weapons that can break the hype bubble around the Kinzhal
Russia’s Kinzhal missiles aren’t exactly hypersonic Why deadly cluster weapons top Ukraine’s wish list China may be using lasers to hack US satellites Russia says T-14 tanks begin combat testing
Why France is still a major nuclear power Iran’s drone factory, HIMARS and more Russia uses space blankets as cloaking devices How stupid are Russian cruise smart bombs? The machine gun emerged as a decisive weapon during the First World War. Image: British Vickers machine gun crew on the Western Front.
Technology during the First World War (1914–1918) reflected a trend towards industrialism and the application of mass production methods to weapons and warfare technology in general. This trend began at least fifty years before World War I during the American Civil War of 1861-1865,
Japan Approves Major Defense Overhaul In Dramatic Policy Shift
The weapons of the First World War included types standardized and improved in the previous period, together with some newly developed types that used innovative technology and a range of improvised weapons used in running warfare. The military technology of the time included important innovations in machine guns, class, and artillery, along with fundamentally new weapons such as submarines, poison gas, warplanes, and tanks.
The early years of World War I could be characterized as a clash of 20th century technology with 19th century military science that created ineffective battles with huge casualties on both sides. On land, the rapid descent into running warfare was a surprise, and it was only in the last year of the war that the major armies made effective strides in revolutionizing command and control and tactics to adapt to the modern battlefield and begin to use a myriad of new technologies for effective military purposes. Tactical reorganizations (such as shifting the focus of command from a 100+ man company to a 10+ man squad) went hand in hand with armored cars, the first submachine guns, and automatic rifles that a single soldier could carry and use.
New metallurgical and chemical industries created new firepower that briefly simplified defenses before new approaches to attack were developed. The use of infantry rifles, rifles with hydraulic recoil mechanisms, barbed wire, zigzag trenches and machine guns made it difficult or almost impossible to cross the defed terrain. The hand class, long used in its crude form, quickly developed as an aid to attacking pits. Probably most important was the introduction of high-explosive shells, which dramatically increased the lethality of artillery over 19th-century equivalents.
The Persian War led to the development of the concrete pillbox, small, solid blocks that could be used to deliver machine gun fire. Pilot boxes can be placed across the battlefield with interlaced fields of fire.
Ukraine Updates: Russia ‘using Scorched Earth Tactics’
Because attacking the enemy was so difficult, tunnel warfare became a major effort during the war. Once enemy positions were undermined, huge amounts of explosives would be planted and detonated in preparation for a ground attack. Ssitive listing devices that could detect the sounds of digging were key to defending against these subterranean incursions. The British proved particularly adept at this tactic, thanks to the skill of their tunneling “sappers” and the sophistication of their surveying devices.
During the war, the immobility of warfare and the need for protection from snipers created a need for loopholes both for firing firearms and for observation.
A “keyhole” steel plate was often used, which had a rotating part to cover a loophole that was not in use.
The British and German armies had already changed from the red coat (British Army) (1902) or Prussian blue (1910) for field uniforms, to the less conspicuous khaki or field grey. Adolphe Messimy, Joseph Gallii and other French leaders proposed to follow suit, but the French army marched to war in their traditional red trousers, and the new “horizon blue” did not begin to receive until 1915.
Book Reviews: Weapons Don’t Make War: Policy, Strategy & Military Technology. By Colin S. Gray. Kansas: University Press Of Kansas. 1993. Xi + 236 Pp. Us$29.95. Isbn 0 7006 0559 2. The
A type of raincoat for British officers, introduced long before the war, gained fame as a coat.
The main armies fought under cloth caps or leather helmets. They rushed to develop new steel helmets, in designs that became icons of their countries.
Enemy observation in running warfare was difficult, prompting the invasion of technology such as the camouflage tree, a man-made observation post that allowed forces to discreetly observe their enemy.
The Frch Canon de 75 modèle 1897 provided rapid, accurate fire in a small, agile unit, but the Western Front often required greater range
Armistice Day: How The British Used World War I Technology In The Middle East
In the 19th century, Britain and France took advantage of the rapid technical development of artillery to serve the War of Movement. Such weapons served well in the colonial wars of that culture, and served Germany very well in the Franco-Prussian War, but a running war was more like a siege and required siege guns. The German army had already anticipated that the European war might require heavier artillery, as it had a more suitable mix of sizes. Foundries responded to the real situation with more heavy products and fewer highly mobile pieces. Germany developed Paris guns of stupid size and range. However, the necessarily stupid muzzle velocity wore out the barrel of the gun after a few shots necessitating a return to the factory for priming, so this weapon served more to frighten and anger urbanites than to kill them or ravage their cities.
At the beginning of the war,
Technology in ww1, how was poison gas used in ww1, what year was ww1, technology advances in ww1, military in ww1, what was ww1, what military technology was used in ww1, new technology in military, military technology in ww1, what was the new technology in ww1, what new technology was used in ww1, what technology was used in ww1