What Were The Non Military Weapons Of The Cold War

What Were The Non Military Weapons Of The Cold War – Dean Winslow, a physician and retired Air Force colonel who deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan as a flight surgeon, appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee last Tuesday. It is considering nominating him to serve as assistant secretary of defense for health affairs in the Trump administration.

During the hearing, Sen. Jean Shaheen, D-N.H., asked Winslow about mental health in the military — specifically the shooter in the Sutherland Springs massacre, who was court-martialed , and was expelled from the Air Force for misdemeanor enforcement for crimes that included threatening others with a gun.

What Were The Non Military Weapons Of The Cold War

Winslow answered the question and then volunteered a point that would have gotten more attention were it not for the deluge of other news. As a veteran with first-hand experience treating war wounds, he said he wanted to highlight “how crazy it is in the United States of America that civilians can go out and buy a semi-automatic assault rifle like the AR-15.” Saw Winslow making these comments from approximately 1:19:00 on the Troops Council video, and read reactions here, here, here, and on pro-gun sites.

Kgm Technologies Wins Their Largest Non Military Contract From Doj

The question Dean Winslow raises—whether weapons designed for the battlefield should be widely circulated among civilians—is something I’ve been discussing on this site.

Back in the 1980s, I wrote about the AR-15’s creator, Eugene Stoner, who put design ideas into the weapon and how it changed before it entered service as the military M-16. detailed long-form article. If you want to know the difference in “barrel twist” of various models of rifles, or the controversy over their bullet size, or how the AR-15 and M-16 compare to the Soviet designed AK-47, or why it is used That gunpowder, I’ll direct you to that article. (Or — please! — at least consider reading this before sending out my angry complaints that I haven’t addressed any of these aspects.)

Over the past week, I’ve posted a series of reader emails about the AR-15 and its uses. You can read the sequence first here, then here, then here. The latest comes from a former Colt engineer whose opinion is similar to Dean Winslow’s: These rifles were designed for the military, not civilians.

See also  What Pay Changes When You Get Married In The Military

Emails keep pouring in on this topic. After the first sift, by throwing out messages containing words like “libtard”, “cuck”, “ass from your elbow”, or “left-wing liar”, I’ll provide a sample of the range of opinions, some of them very detailed. start:

Uvalde Shooter Bought Two Rifles Days After 18th Birthday

One engineer I quoted said that the AR-15 entered military production (as the M-16) before it appeared on the civilian market. Some readers disagree, and the details are provided here:

In your article “Why the AR-15 was never intended to reach civilian hands”, your sources claim that the AR-15 was not sold to civilians until it was standardized by the military. This is actually incorrect. Colt sent an aviator model rifle (serial number GX4968) to the BATF for civilian sale approval on 23 October 1963. It was approved on December 10, 1963, and sales of “Model R6000 Colt AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifle” began on January 2, 1964. The M16 was not issued to infantry units until 1965 (as the XM16E1), was not standardized as the M16A1 until 1967, and did not officially replace the M14 until 1969. Colt sold the semi-automatic AR-15 to civilians for 5 years until the M16A1 replaced the M14. According to SP1 serial number records, Colt sold at least 2,501 rifles to the civilian market by 1965, at least 8,250 rifles by 1967, and 14,653 rifles by 1969 . Your source further stated that he was concerned about “the weapon being seen anywhere other than the battlefield,” and suggested that Stoner would be as well. Colt was actually selling rifles to the civilian market while they were testing and improving rifles with the military in an attempt to secure a contract. I don’t see how anyone working at Colt could not know this, especially with so many civilian sales by 1967. At least seven rifles were sold every day on the civilian market that year. Also, while I don’t want to imply that you are trying to mislead by citing this source in your article, it is prudent to note that a number of recent (over the years) articles have been attempting to describe the civilian sale of the AR-15 as some recent development , to explain the increase in mass shootings. The Colt AR-15 has been on the civilian market for 53 years (since 1964) and AR-15 style rifles have been produced by companies other than Colt for 40 years (since Stoner acquired the AR-15 gas system in 1977 patent has since expired). The sale of AR-15s to civilians even predates background checks (Gun Control Act of 1968). The first record I can find of shooting an AR-15 is George Banks in 1982 – it had been on the market for 18 years at that point, the Colt’s SP1 serial number shows 158, 201 rifles sold… it’s in modern Mass shootings are unique, and no doubt the media’s superstitious obsession with the details, motives, and equipment of mass murderers will spurn (as do mass shootings themselves). Finally, I take issue with your article “Why is the AR-15 so deadly”. The potential for fragmentation injury (which is the result of a fast-moving bullet being deflected in tissue) is negligible compared to that of a hollow-pointed bullet that typically swells to twice the bullet diameter. Such bullets have been around since at least 1899, when they were banned (wrongly, in my opinion) by the Hague Convention. Jim Sullivan, one of the designers of the AR-15, confirms this here: “But the 5.56 can’t use hunting cartridge bullets, which legally extend the hollow point more deadly than the roll, and their kill The power depends entirely on how powerful they are.” For decades, almost every cartridge has a hollow point bullet, and it has completely surpassed military ammunition (due to the restrictions of the Geneva Convention). The cartridges recommended for police and government use are all hollow point derivative designs, so their lethality is related to the size of the projectile, not the weapon system itself. For this reason, no department to my knowledge uses the original M193 or M855. In short: These two articles seem to describe the AR-15 as a rifle that should not have/been sold to civilians, and one that is inherently uniquely lethal. From both perspectives, this is clearly wrong. To be sure, there is good research in your article (and the 1981 article), but there is more correct information available, and I think the title is misleading (“Why the AR-15 was never intended to fall into in the hands of civilians”, and “Why the AR-15 is So Deadly”). A more correct headline would be: “Why the AR-15 Was Sold to Civilians Before the Army Decided to Adopt It”, and “Why the AR-15’s Cartridge Is Particularly Deadly Compared to Modern Technology Available in the U.S. Fatal” time. “Of course, they don’t quite catch your attention.

See also  What Is The Most Powerful Military In The World 2021

You’d think I disagree with a lot of this, and I don’t, but I’ll save that for another day. Now I’m giving a range of people their voice. Here’s another reader with a similar complaint:

Regarding your comment on your recent article “The Nature of the AR-15”: You are hypocritical when you claim that the AR-15 is “more lethal” than the M16, at least not distinguishing between the original ArmaLite AR-15s and the AR-15s Available commercially today. [JF Note: The point of this article is that the M-16 became less reliable than the AR-15 because the process of its “militarization” changed. ] The AR-15 sold at your local sporting goods store is a far cry from the ArmaLite AR-15 that was first used experimentally in Southeast Asia in 1962-63 for two reasons. 1) The original AR-15s used in Vietnam were capable of semi-automatic or full-automatic fire, whereas all AR-15s sold to civilians today are semi-automatic only. 2) The original AR-15 barrel had a 1:14 twist, the effect of which you described yourself in your 1981 article. Virtually all AR-15s sold today have a 1-in-7, 1-in-8, or 1-in-9 barrel twist. [This lower barrel twist rate causes the bullet to spin faster, so it stays more stable in flight and on impact. ]

No Future’ For G36 Rifles In The German Army

Most of the complaints of troops currently serving at sea are that they strike with little loss. When Stoner first downsized the 7.62 [bigger bullet] AR-10 to the smaller 5.56 bullet AR-15, the barrel rotated within 14 inches. Marines

What were the dates of the cold war, military aircraft of the cold war, non alignment cold war, which countries were in the cold war, what countries were communist during the cold war, what were the consequences of the cold war, cold war non fiction, cold war military uniforms, what countries were involved in the cold war, the cold war a military history, what years were the cold war, cold war military surplus

See also  What Physical Conditions Will Keep You Out Of The Military

Check Also

What Is The Top Of A Military Flag Pole Called

What Is The Top Of A Military Flag Pole Called – The United States Joint …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *